Grapes.msu.edu
About Us
Search
Newsletters
Weather / Climate
Viticulture
Pest
management
Scouting guide
Publications
Calendar of events
Industry links
Contacts
Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view pdf files.
Pest and natural enemy interactions
Excerpt from Fruit Crop Ecology and Management, Chapter 2: Managing the Community of Pests and Beneficials by Larry Gut, Annemiek Schilder, Rufus Isaacs and Patricia McManus.
Home > Scouting guide> pest and natural enemy interactions  
Integrated pest management emphasizes the importance of interactions between pests and the natural enemies that prey upon them. When broad-spectrum insecticides are applied, pest and non-pest species are killed and the balance of the community is disrupted. For example, pesticide use in pear orchards to control codling moth can also destroy the natural enemies of pear psylla. In the absence of its natural enemies, pear psylla can reach high densities and cause significant damage to the fruit.

Quick links

- Common predators and their prey in fruit crops
- Common parasites and some of their hosts in fruit crops
- Monitor pest and beneficial species
- Pathogen and vector relationships
- The need for alternative food sources for beneficials
- Impact of cultural practices
- Impact of pesticides (including secondary pest outbreaks)
Keep these killers on the loose
Ecological concept
Natural enemies help keep pest populations in check.

Putting it into practice
Preserve natural enemies.

There is good potential for biological control of several fruit pests if populations of predators and parasitoids are preserved and enhanced.


A syrphid larva capturing and feeding on an aphid.
Photo: Matt O'Neal.

For example, biological control of plant-eating mites is achieved in many fruit production systems by conserving predatory mites, as well as predacious beetles and bugs. To avoid killing natural enemies of mites, pesticides must be selected carefully. Two classes of insecticides that are highly toxic for mite predators are the pyrethroids and the carbamates. Biological control of apple leafminers by parasitoids is common in Pacific Northwest orchards, and has potential in other areas. To conserve these important allies, avoid using moderately and highly toxic insecticides from mid-June to early July when adult parasitoids are most active.

Use control tactics that are the least harmful to natural enemies. Avoid insecticides that are highly toxic to predators and parasitoids. If one of these materials must be used, spray when natural enemies are least vulnerable. In general, broad-spectrum insecticides applied early in the growing season, before many natural enemies have become active or moved into the crop, tend to be less disruptive than those applied later in the summer. Use spot treatments or delayed applications when it appears natural enemies might be able to provide control.
Predators
Natural enemies are divided into two main groups: predators and parasites. A predator lives by capturing and feeding on another species. Predators are usually larger and more powerful than their prey. Many of the most common predators in fruit production systems attack a wide range of pest species and help regulate pest population densities.
Common predators and some of their prey in fruit crops
Predators Prey
Amoebae Soilborne fungi, bacteria
Anthocorid bugs Spider mites, thrips, aphids, pear psylla, young scale, various insect eggs
Bigeyed bugs Lygus bugs, aphids, leafhoppers, spider mites
Collembola Fungi
Ladybird beetles Aphids, scale insects, pear psylla, mealybugs, other soft-bodied prey
Lacewings Aphids, scale insects, mealybugs, pear psylla leafhoppers, thrips, mites
Mirid bugs Spider mites, aphids, leafhoppers, pear psylla, scale insects
Mycophagous mites Fungi, eg. grapevine powdery mildew
Nematodes Soilborne fungi, bacteria, other nematodes
Predatory mites Plant-feeding mites
Spiders Pear psylla, aphids, leafhoppers
Syrphid flies or flower flies Aphids, scale insects
Common parasites and some of their hosts in fruit crops
Parasites Hosts
Aphelinid wasps Aphids
Tachinid flies Caterpillars, beetles
Trichogramma wasps Moth eggs
Bacillus thuringiensis (bacterium) Butterfly/moth larvae
Pseudomonas fluorescens (bacterium) Fungi
Polyhedrosis virus Butterfly/moth larvae
Beauveria bassiana (fungus) Many insects
Trichoderma harzianum (fungus) Pythium, Rhizoctonia and other pathogens
Ampelomyces quisqualis (fungus) Powdery mildew
Arthrobytris (nematode-trapping fungus) Nematodes
Steinernema (nematode) Insect larvae

Pasteuria penetrans (bacterium)

Nematodes

Parasites
A parasite lives in, on, or with another organism and obtains food and usually shelter at the host's expense. Parasitic insects and microbes are important in the biological control of many pests. Plant pathogens may be considered parasites that cause disease symptoms in plants.

An insect that is parasitic on other insects during its immature stages, but is free-living as an adult, is called a parasitoid. Most parasitoids are small flies or wasps. Parasitoids are often common in flowering plants such as fruit crops and therefore are potentially very beneficial allies of fruit growers. Some parasitoids are specialists, attacking one or a few host species, while a few are generalists and use a wide variety of other insects as hosts. The free-living adults often feed on the nectar provided by flowers. The female parasitoid finds a host and lays eggs. The parasitoid larva develops inside or on the host. At first the larva feeds only on fatty tissues, allowing the host to continue to grow and develop. As the parasitoid nears the end of its development, it consumes the host's vital organs, killing it. The parasitoid larva pupates and later emerges as an adult.

A. A wasp lays an egg in a host (in this example, an aphid). B and C. As the host feeds and grows, so does the wasp larva. D. The parasitoid kills then pupates within the dead host. E. An adult parasitoid emerges from the dead host.
The emerging parasitoid often leaves behind telltale signs of its handiwork. When scouting for pests, also watch for parasitoid pupal cases or emergence holes in insect bodies. Try to choose management strategies that protect parasitoids such as using selective insecticides.
The good, the bad and the ugly
Ecological concept
Many kinds of organisms inhabit fruit production systems.

Putting it into practice
Monitor both pest and beneficial species.

A good scouting program is key to making ecologically sound pest management decisions. The need for control and the impact of any action are determined by monitoring pest and natural enemy populations. Sampling provides information on the organisms present, their stages of development, population densities, and the ratio of pests to natural enemies. A scout must know how an organism develops because different life stages may be monitored in different ways. For example, you would sample fruit to look for grape berry moth larvae, but use pheromone traps to monitor adults. In addition, a single life stage may move to different plant parts as the season progresses. Oriental fruit moth larvae attack terminal shoots early in the season, feed in shoots and fruit in the middle of the summer, but only infest fruit late in the season.

Sampling for predators and parasitoids is as important as monitoring pest populations. Higher pest densities can be tolerated when populations of natural enemies are also high. For example, a mite spray may be warranted in apple when there are two or three mites per leaf if there are no natural enemies, but a grower might wait until there are five or six per leaf if one predator mite per leaf is also present. Monitoring parasitoid populations can be tricky as often it is only the signs of their presence that can be readily detected. For example, aphid parasitoids that feed within their hosts cause the aphids to become puffy or mummified and tan, golden, or black in color. A round hole can be observed where the wasp has cut its way out of the aphid mummy.

Parasitic microbes such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses can cause diseases of insects. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a well-known bacterium that kills insects with a potent toxin. Bt must be eaten before it can kill its host, so sprays should be timed to coincide with warm periods when the target insect is most likely to be feeding. Once consumed, the Bt toxin destroys the insect's gut. Infected insects become lethargic, stop feeding, and die.
Parasites also keep pathogen populations in check. For instance, the fungus Ampelomyces quisqualis parasitizes powdery mildew fungi on several fruit crops. A commercial formulation can be applied to slow disease development by reducing vigor and spore production of the mildew colonies. Also well known are Trichoderma species, which parasitize soilborne pathogens such as Rhizoctonia and Pythium.

Even more interesting are soil-inhabiting fungi that trap and devour nematodes with specialized structures that resemble lollipops and lassos. Bacteria are also known to parasitize nematodes. For example, the bacterium Pasteuria penetrans attacks the root knot nematode.

Mutually beneficial relationships
Some parasitic fungi have mutually beneficial relationships with plants. For example, mycorrhizae are fungi that live inside plant roots and generally have a beneficial effect on the plant. They use their extensive threadlike mycelia to absorb nutrients and water from the soil, passing them on to the plant roots. In return, the plant provides shelter and nourishes the fungus. Mycorrhizae may also protect plant roots against pathogen invasion.

Some insects live together to benefit one another, and this can make pest management more challenging. Aphids can often be found living in a mutually beneficial arrangement with colonies of ants. In this case, the aphids produce honeydew and the ants harvest the sugary liquid for food. Worker ants can be seen running between aphid colonies and their nests in the soil. In return, the ants protect aphids from predators, and may even carry them to a better habitat if the plant starts to die. This interaction can lead to rapid increases in aphid populations because natural enemies are prevented from regulating the aphids.

Pathogen and vector relationships
Another important interaction among organisms in a fruit crop is the role of insects in spreading diseases. Blueberry aphids, which are pests in their own right, can also vector blueberry shoestring virus, which causes malformation of blueberry shoots and leaves and a decline in vigor and productivity. The mummy berry fungus forms a unique alliance with an insect that visits blueberry flowers daily. Bees are fooled into thinking that the shoots covered with fungal spores are actually flowers by the distinct UV patterns produced by the diseased tissue. The spores, which are produced in a sweet sticky matrix, easily stick to the bee's body and are delivered to the stigma where infection occurs. Below ground, certain nematodes are also vectors for plant pathogens. The dagger nematode can transmit the tobacco and tomato ringspot viruses to various hosts, including grapes. These viruses cause a slow decline of the grapevine.

Ants tending aphids to benefit from the aphid-produced honeydew. Photo: Tyler Fox.

Alternative food sources
Some predators and parasitoids use alternative food sources during the growing season. These include prey or hosts other than pests, and nectar producing plants other than fruit crops. If an alternative host is not available, the predator or parasitoid may not survive or stay long enough in the crop to control pests when needed. Predatory mites often feed on rust mites when their primary hosts, spider mites, are absent or in low numbers.

Parasitoids may require an alternative host to complete their life cycle. A small parasitic wasp, Colpoclypeus florus, can have a major impact on some leafroller populations in apple orchards. However, C. florus is often not present in high numbers early in the season because none of the leafrollers in the orchard overwinter as late instar larvae, the host size required to complete its development. Another leafroller host of this parasitic wasp overwinters as a large larva on wild rose, found in wild habitats around orchards. Larvae of the parasitoid successfully overwinter in this host on rose and complete their development early in the spring. They then emerge and can fly to colonize leafrollers in nearby orchards.

Many natural enemies require more than one kind of food to develop normally and sustain their populations. Syrphid fly adults supplement their diets by gathering and eating pollen from flowering plants. Where natural enemies have access to pollen and nectar, there is often more predation and lower abundance of pests. Similarly, parasitic wasps supplement their diets by feeding on nectar, aphid honeydew, and other sources of sugar. For example, Trichogramma species are tiny wasps that parasitize the eggs of moths, such as codling moth. Planting a cover crop that includes flowering plants is a good way to provide nectar sources for these beneficial insects, but care must be taken in selecting a cover crop that is not a host for other pests.

Some pathogens also need to find alternative hosts when a fruit host is unavailable. For example, the root knot nematode can also reproduce on dandelions in vineyards. This weed can also serve as a host for viruses that are vectored by the dagger nematode. Weed management is essential to reduce these types of risk. Cover crops that suppress weeds and nematodes have been used in fruit systems and are likely to play an even more important role in the future. Verticillium albo-atrum, a soilborne fungus that causes a severe wilt in strawberries, also attacks the roots of many other hosts, especially solanaceous crops like tomatoes, peppers, and potatoes. Growers are advised not to plant strawberries after Verticillium-susceptible crops.

Management influences on the community
Management practices change the dynamics of the community of pests and natural enemies within the crop. The positive effects like reduced pest numbers and increased yields are obvious. Certain management decisions, however, can have unintended impacts on the community.

Impact of cultural practices
Fire blight of apple and pear was once considered a sporadic disease that usually could be managed by combining cultural and chemical methods. Since the early 1990's, however, fire blight has plagued apple growers to a degree previously unknown. Indeed, modern fire blight epidemics have been an economic disaster.

The "new face" of fire blight has resulted from several changes in the apple crop habitat. Genetic, physical, and cultural factors have interacted to create ideal conditions for growth and spread of the fire blight pathogen:

  • The number of trees planted per acre has increased dramatically. This means that fire blight can move more easily from tree to tree.
  • More acres are being planted to highly susceptible cultivars, including Braeburn, Fuji, Jonathan, and Rome.
  • Size-controlling rootstocks, many of which are highly susceptible to fire blight, are used to achieve high-density plantings.
  • Trees are being pushed to bear earlier and training systems are being adopted that are very different from the way apple trees grow in nature. These modern orchards have a high density of apple tissues such as flowers and young shoots that are very susceptible to fire blight. Traditional, low-density orchards also have susceptible tissues, but they are interspersed with a lot of older, woody tissues that are much less favorable to the growth of the fire blight pathogen.

New tools are being developed to manage fire blight on susceptible varieties in high-density plantings. For example, there are a few size-controlling rootstocks that are relatively resistant to fire blight. Certain plant growth regulators reduce vigorous shoot growth and thereby reduce shoot susceptibility to fire blight. Also, larger trees planted at lower densities will not have the production potential of the more modern orchard systems, but they will be more likely to survive fire blight long enough to yield a crop.

Pesticide impacts on the community
Although pesticide sprays are generally targeted against one or a few pest populations, they often influence other pest and non-pest species. Some insecticides are very toxic to predators and parasitoids. Destroying these natural enemies often results in target pest resurgence or secondary pest outbreaks. Some pesticides have a greater impact on the natural enemies than the target pest. Target pest resurgence can result when the unfavorable ratio of pests to natural enemies permits a rapid increase or resurgence of the pest population. For example, biological control of twospotted spider mite by predatory mites is common in many fruit crops. Insecticides that are applied for control of pest mites and insects are often highly toxic to predatory mites. Some pest mites survive the spray, but most predators are killed. The population of twospotted spider mites is able to quickly rebound, reaching economically damaging levels before its natural enemy can re-colonize from unsprayed areas.

Pre-plant fumigation of the soil is often used for control of black root rot in strawberry. However, if black root rot pathogens are re-introduced in fumigated soil with infected planting material, the disease comes back with a vengeance, presumably because competitive organisms in the soil have been eliminated by the fumigation.

A secondary pest outbreak occurs when a pesticide that was applied to control one pest kills the natural enemies that were keeping a second pest population in check. For example, a complex of predators can be helpful in keeping aphid populations from reaching damaging levels. The broad-spectrum insecticides that are used to control key pests are highly toxic to these predators. As a result, applying one of these insecticides often leads to secondary outbreaks of aphid populations. Pesticide applications can also impact beneficial microbes leading to increased plant disease problems.

Secondary pest problems are not always associated with the destruction of natural enemies. Control of codling moth by mating disruption entails releasing enough sex pheromone into orchards to interfere with mate location, reducing reproduction and subsequent larval infestations. However, using this highly specific tactic in place of broad-spectrum insecticides can also have a significant impact on other potential pests. In disrupted orchards, leafrollers that were kept at non-damaging levels by broad-spectrum insecticides are now only suppressed by natural enemies. Unless natural controls provide sufficient suppression, leafroller populations will increase, sometimes reaching damaging levels.

In similar fashion, minor diseases that are not normally a problem can become important when major diseases are controlled. Since pathogens often compete for space and nutrients, removing one pathogen with a fungicide may benefit other pathogens that are not affected by that particular fungicide. An example of this is the increase in Alternaria infections of blueberry fruit in fields that have been treated with a fungicide against anthracnose fruit rot.
Bottom of page.
Site map           Copyright/Linking
Bottom of page.
Funding for this web site provided by Project GREEEN, American Farmland Trust, EPA Region 5's Strategic Agricultural Initiative program, The National Foundation for IPM Education, the Center for Agricultural Partnerships and the MSU Integrated Pest Management Program in collaboration with MSU Extension and the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station. Partially support from NC-IPM Center.

05/26/11 Contact: E. Haney
     
Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Michigan State University Extension